Dhaka 11:45 am, Saturday, 28 February 2026
News Title :
দিনাজপুর মেডিকেলে ক্লাব কমিটির পদ নিয়ে ছাত্রদলের দু’পক্ষের হাতাহাতি। নরসিংদীতে কিশোরীকে ধর্ষণ ও হত্যা মামলার প্রধান আসামি নূরা গ্রেফতার। ইজারাদারের কাছে যুবদল নেতার ৫ লাখ টাকা চাঁদা দাবি, ওসির সামনে হাত-পা ভেঙে দেওয়ার হুমকি। – Jubo Dal leader demands Tk 5 lakh extortion from lessor, threatens to break hands and legs in front of OC. Zelenskyy says he’d accept nuclear weapons from UK, France ‘with pleasure’. সেলিনা হায়াৎ আইভী শোন অ্যারেস্ট। – Selina Hayat Ivy Shon Arrest. US lifts sanctions on top Malian officials as ties improve. An international solidarity activist and other Palestinians were injured in an illegal Israeli settler attack on the town of Qusra, south of Nablus in the occupied West Bank, on February 27. শক্তিশালী ভূমিকম্পে কেঁপে উঠল সাতক্ষীরা, সিসি ক্যামেরার দৃশ্য। – World’s largest aircraft carrier reaches Israeli shores amid US military buildup ঝালকাঠিতে ডান্ডাবেড়ি পায়ে বাবার জানাজায় কার্যক্রম নিষিদ্ধ ছাত্রলীগ নেতা।

What is at stake in Italy’s referendum on judicial reform?

 

WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE REFORM?
The proposed changes would separate the careers of judges and public prosecutors, ending the current system in which both roles share a single entry exam, operate within the same career track and may switch roles early in their professional life.
Under the reform, prosecutors and judges would follow two distinct career paths from the start, with no possibility of movement between them.
The plan also calls for splitting the High Council of the Judiciary (CSM) into two independent bodies: one for judges and one for prosecutors. Membership selection rules would change, introducing the use of sortition, or lottery.
In addition, the reform creates a new High Disciplinary Court to oversee misconduct cases.
WHAT IS AT STAKE?
Successive governments have discussed separating judicial careers since the late 1980s, but the debate has always been snarled by fierce partisan politics preventing change.
Proponents say the reform will modernise the system and better align Italy with other democracies, such as France and Germany, reinforcing impartiality within the judiciary by cutting ties between judges and prosecutors.
Introducing a method of random selection for members of the new CSM bodies will make it harder for influential factions, often with political affiliations, to gain traction within the judiciary, the government says.

Write Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save Your Email and Others Information

About Author Information

Daily Prime Post

Popular Post

দিনাজপুর মেডিকেলে ক্লাব কমিটির পদ নিয়ে ছাত্রদলের দু’পক্ষের হাতাহাতি।

What is at stake in Italy’s referendum on judicial reform?

Update Time : 09:46:30 pm, Thursday, 19 February 2026

 

WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE REFORM?
The proposed changes would separate the careers of judges and public prosecutors, ending the current system in which both roles share a single entry exam, operate within the same career track and may switch roles early in their professional life.
Under the reform, prosecutors and judges would follow two distinct career paths from the start, with no possibility of movement between them.
The plan also calls for splitting the High Council of the Judiciary (CSM) into two independent bodies: one for judges and one for prosecutors. Membership selection rules would change, introducing the use of sortition, or lottery.
In addition, the reform creates a new High Disciplinary Court to oversee misconduct cases.
WHAT IS AT STAKE?
Successive governments have discussed separating judicial careers since the late 1980s, but the debate has always been snarled by fierce partisan politics preventing change.
Proponents say the reform will modernise the system and better align Italy with other democracies, such as France and Germany, reinforcing impartiality within the judiciary by cutting ties between judges and prosecutors.
Introducing a method of random selection for members of the new CSM bodies will make it harder for influential factions, often with political affiliations, to gain traction within the judiciary, the government says.